Thomas Williams
These decadent SOB's accusing Judge Kavanaugh of sexual assault and abuse.
These women are behaving so gross, crude, and vulgar over what they are now saying publicly against Judge Kavanaugh that they would be laughed out of a Court of Law because of the lack of real facts of evidence.
Nasty man-hating women taring back into mainstream society with an exhaustive flush look in their cheeks ripping and kicking at the honor and pride of old white men in America.
All of the Globalist with open border immigration political policies hell-bent on changing the Western Hemisphere white men laws and traditions into what they want the new world order governments societies to be.
Natural genders nutty people screwing over you and me.
And what did Grassley do? He started getting genetic with these horrible twisted people letting them attack Judge Kavanaugh publicly over and over again?
Why did you do that Senator Grassley?
--------
Eminent California Professor And Human Memory Expert Weigh In On Christine Ford’s Allegations.
“I’m a Democrat and pro-choice but we have to be fair." 5 key points. by Scott Morefield
“I’m a Democrat and pro-choice but we have to be fair." 5 key points. by Scott Morefield
Elizabeth Loftus is a professor at the University of California, Irvine, a cognitive psychologist, and a preeminent expert on human memory.
Her casework has been crucial in establishing a stricter standard for “recovered memories” in criminal trials. She is also a self-described “pro-choice Democrat” who is “scared” at the prospect of a Supreme Court with Kavanaugh on it, yet honest and fair-minded enough to want the process to be “fair” to all involved.
Much is at stake based on one individual’s 36-years-removed memory, and especially her reported dependence on the controversial practice of psychotherapy. Listed below are five key points.
1) Loftus notes “I don’t see any evidence she said the name at that time [in 2012], so when did she attach the name of Brett Kavanaugh to the episode?”
2) “There is a motive to remember sexual assault because there is a motive to explain your problems and give you a justification and a reason for why you have problems, and I see that happen in a typical recovered memory case. We don't know the kind of marital difficulty that brought her into therapy with her husband."
3) Dr. Loftus also expressed skepticism about the PTSD Ford claims as a result of the assault.
4) She says "There’s a chance continued psychotherapy beyond the initial disclosure session could have resulted in what it sometimes does: developing the story, making it more coherent, and adding details. But did those details get developed in psychotherapy? You can have intelligent, educated people who develop distorted memories. It could happen to any of us.”
5) Could Ford have somehow “amplified” what happened to her to construct a very real “memory” of something that at the time may have been in actuality more benign - such as a misplaced grope or an awkward kiss?
Loftus says “It is certainly possible that it wasn’t quite as frightening or as violent as she’s now describing it, as a violent attempted rape,” said Dr. Loftus. “It’s possible that it got more extreme in the course of her thinking about it.”
Her casework has been crucial in establishing a stricter standard for “recovered memories” in criminal trials. She is also a self-described “pro-choice Democrat” who is “scared” at the prospect of a Supreme Court with Kavanaugh on it, yet honest and fair-minded enough to want the process to be “fair” to all involved.
Much is at stake based on one individual’s 36-years-removed memory, and especially her reported dependence on the controversial practice of psychotherapy. Listed below are five key points.
1) Loftus notes “I don’t see any evidence she said the name at that time [in 2012], so when did she attach the name of Brett Kavanaugh to the episode?”
2) “There is a motive to remember sexual assault because there is a motive to explain your problems and give you a justification and a reason for why you have problems, and I see that happen in a typical recovered memory case. We don't know the kind of marital difficulty that brought her into therapy with her husband."
3) Dr. Loftus also expressed skepticism about the PTSD Ford claims as a result of the assault.
4) She says "There’s a chance continued psychotherapy beyond the initial disclosure session could have resulted in what it sometimes does: developing the story, making it more coherent, and adding details. But did those details get developed in psychotherapy? You can have intelligent, educated people who develop distorted memories. It could happen to any of us.”
5) Could Ford have somehow “amplified” what happened to her to construct a very real “memory” of something that at the time may have been in actuality more benign - such as a misplaced grope or an awkward kiss?
Loftus says “It is certainly possible that it wasn’t quite as frightening or as violent as she’s now describing it, as a violent attempted rape,” said Dr. Loftus. “It’s possible that it got more extreme in the course of her thinking about it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment