Tinker - Donald Trump was interfered with by the Federal Court 64 times in Trump's first Administration and 16 more times in his early 2nd White House administration. What are these Federal Judges doing all that for?
Video of "Under no Definition do we have a Democracy"- https://rumble.com/ & Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=979679394270748
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ybgYpWeF
Stephen Miller speaks on Venezuelan immigrants deported to El Salvador (March 17, 2025)-----
First off we are not a democracy. We are a representative govt. u elect officials to represent u.
----
If Judges were appointed to a bench by a President, can they be removed by another President?
-------
Ron Cutrera - Fafebook
-------
Larry Garrett - Facebook
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONnjzTbSt7o
Cindy Perero Guidry - Facebook
Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be the presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts.
Boasberg has assembled his shields over the years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed *Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC.
[*strong probability McCord is active CIA]
McCord's husband, Sheldon Snook, was the key staff of Roberts and almost certainly the leaker of the Dobbs decision. Chief Justice Roberts had to hide that reality (which he did after the US Marshal investigation) because it put the leak inside his office.
Boasberg knows this (and other stuff) and Roberts reacts to eyes on Boasberg from a defensive posture.
Roberts is already obfuscating the issue...
This isn't a "disagreement over a judge's decision."
This is a "disagreement over a judge's authority itself."
Roberts ALLOWED his FISC to be defrauded. No accountability for the fraud = participation
Impeach Roberts...
--------
No comments:
Post a Comment