Tinker
I
would absolutely go occupy Iraq with my military until that country was a safe
haven for people to live in. And to stabilize that region of the world so
terrorist could not keep attacking the United States of America ever again.
Even
if it take the rest of our lifetime?
That
region economy would pay for our military expense so I could execute my plan
and goal to make their country safe. So we could all rest easier knowing that
whoever has ambitions of becoming a crazed terrorist would be killed and taken
out of circulation.
I see that George W. Bush will not talk about Iraq falling
apart from tribal terror. That seem very stupid of George W. to me. Because he
had a lot to say about Iraq when he ordered the United States Military to
attack that country in 2003?
So
even if both of those hack politicians did or didn't do right before now, this is
what I would do?
I would order my military back into Iraq and to do that job
right?
----------------
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2657229/Obama-rules-OUT-sending-troops-combat-Iraq-promises-review-military-options.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2657229/Obama-rules-OUT-sending-troops-combat-Iraq-promises-review-military-options.html
Obama rules
OUT sending troops back into combat in Iraq but promises to review military
options – including air strikes
Published: 11:14 EST, 13 June 2014
Barack Obama said Friday that his national security team
will soon provide him with a list of 'selective actions by our military' to
help push back a terrorist horde marching through Iraq, but insisted that 'we
will not be sending U.S. troops back into combat' there.
He will be 'reviewing options in the days ahead,' the U.S.
president said in a hastily scheduled statement on the South Lawn of the White
House, before boarding Marine One en route to Bismarck, North Dakota.
The murderous Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS),
formerly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq, 'poses a danger to Iraq and its people,'
Obama said, 'and given the nature of these terrorists, it could pose a threat
to America and its interests as well.'
But he emphasized that Iraq's government should 'solve their
own problems.'
The United States, Obama insisted, will not get involved in
a protracted military campaign in the absence of work toward a political
solution in the nation that Saddam Hussein once ruled with an iron fist.
Former President George W. Bush, his predecessor who sent
U.S. servicemen and women into Iraq by the tens of thousands, is determined to
hold his tongue.
Susan Rice, Obama's national security adviser, is not
traveling with him to North Dakota, Deputy Press Secretary Joshua Earnest told
reporters aboard Air Force One.
Earnest said that military options under consideration 'do
not include ... putting combat boots on the ground in Iraq.'
They also exclude, he added, a Bush-style open-ended
military commitment on behalf of the United States.'
Instead, the White House is conditioning 'any commitment of
military resources or a military operation' on an agreement from Iraqi leaders
to commit 'to pursue an inclusive, political agenda' with Sunni Islamists who
are terrorizing their cities.
Former President George W. Bush has been reluctant to weigh
in on the latest developments in the region where he spent years deploying
military assets that Obama would later pull back.
A request for comment from the former president was met with
a non-response from his communications director Freddy Ford, who told
MailOnline: 'I don’t have a comment for you. When he left office President Bush
decided not to criticize his successor.'
Meanwhile, a senior Air Force official in Afghanistan told
MailOnline on Friday that his forces, along with others in the Middle East,
have been told to expect briefings on contingency plans in the next 72 hours.
Those contingency plans could include a wide range of
military and nonmilitary options, he cautioned, but said he expects that
anything the president might order would focus principally on air bases closer
to the Persian Gulf.
The prospect of U.S. forces as far away as Kabul being put
on alert, however, lends credence to an all-hands-on-deck airstrike scenario
designed to cripple ISIS's forces.
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
----------------
----------------
No comments:
Post a Comment